Back to Insights

How AI Has Flipped the Buy vs Build Equation

Brad Anderson

Written By:

Brad Anderson

Director of Technology

4 Minute Read

Last Updated:

Jun 24, 2025

blog image

Executive Summary

Modern development practices have cut custom-software costs by up to 80 % while SaaS subscription fees have risen sharply.
For organisations spending more than $50 K a year on licences—or facing heavy integration and compliance needs—building is now often the cheaper, lower-risk path.


1. Why the Equation Changed

Three forces converged:

  1. Generative code assistants (GitHub Copilot, Claude, GPT-4) now create 40–60 % of production code, compressing timelines from months to weeks.
  2. Automated quality tooling writes tests, finds bugs, and generates documentation, slashing maintenance overhead.
  3. SaaS inflation—especially “seat-based” pricing—outpaces IT budgets and forces painful licence audits.

The net result is a permanent cost inversion: custom can be cheaper than commodity.


2. The New Cost Math at a Glance

Old vs New Costs for CRM, CMS, Ecommerce

ApplicationPre-AI Build CostAI-Era Build CostSaaS 3-Year Cost *
CRM$150-500 K$30-100 K$288-960 K
CMS$75-200 K$15-50 K$72-360 K
Ecommerce$100-300 K$25-75 K$60-180 K

* Representative pricing: Salesforce Enterprise, Contentful Enterprise, Shopify Plus.


3. When Buying Still Wins — and When It Doesn’t

BuyBuildHybrid
Simple, well-defined workflowsUnique workflows & data modelsPhased migrations
< 25 users≥ 50 users or $50 K / yr SaaS spendKeep commodity modules, replace bottlenecks
No strict compliance needsData sovereignty / FedRAMP / WCAGCombine open-source core + custom extensions

4. Platform Snapshots

CRM

Off-the-shelf works for small sales teams. Once headcount or compliance increases, licence costs quickly eclipse an AI-built alternative that you fully own.

Content Management

Headless SaaS shines for marketing sites with vanilla workflows. Complex editorial governance, multi-brand requirements, or API-first mandates favour custom CMS.

Ecommerce

Shopify is unbeatable below $10 M GMV. Enterprise merchants with dynamic pricing, multi-storefront logic, or SAP integration needs gain ROI by building.

(Need details? See our CMS migration guide and E-commerce replatform checklist).


5. Government & Enterprise Spotlight

Government agencies and Fortune 1000 firms share two pain points: licence scale and regulatory drag. A Colorado state portal we rebuilt saved $1.05 M in three years compared with Salesforce Government Cloud while achieving Section 508 compliance from day one.


6. AI Tooling Landscape (2025)

CategoryLeading ToolsTypical Impact
Code generationCopilot, Cursor, GPT-440-60 % faster feature delivery
Testing & QADiffblue, CodiumAIAutomated unit/integration tests, fewer bugs
DocumentationMintlify, SwimmUp-to-date docs, lower onboarding time
Low-code scaffoldsVercel v0, Replit AgentUI generation in minutes

7. Implementation Roadmap

timeline
    title Build-First Decision Timeline
    2025-Week1 : Assessment & TCO analysis
    2025-Week5 : AI-powered proof-of-concept
    2025-Week10: Full build kick-off or SaaS renegotiation

8. Key Objections — and Reality Checks

“Development takes too long.”
AI shortens timelines by 50–70 %, and phased releases deliver value early.

“We lack dev resources.”
Most SaaS rollouts need integrators anyway. Partner with an AI-enabled team—like Fruition—while up-skilling internally.

“Custom is riskier.”
Vendor lock-in, price hikes, and API limits are risks too. Modern modular stacks plus automated tests mitigate build risk.


9. Decision Checklist (Download)

Thinking of switching?
Download our 1-page Buy vs Build Checklist (PDF) to score cost, risk, and strategic fit in under 15 minutes.


Conclusion

The question is no longer “Can we afford to build?”
It’s “Can we afford not to?”

Ready for an impartial assessment? Schedule a complimentary 30-minute consultation with our technology strategists and receive a personalised TCO model.

Book a Consultation{.btn .btn-primary}


About the Author

Brad Anderson headshot

Brad Anderson is Fruition’s Director of Technology with more than two decades of experience helping enterprises optimise software architecture and total cost of ownership. He leads the firm’s engineering practice focused on practical AI acceleration, guiding Fortune 500, public-sector, and high-growth organisations through complex build-versus-buy decisions.


Updated with 2025 pricing data and AI tooling benchmarks.